<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for LooseBolts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loosebolts.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Cloud Computing, Infrastructure at Scale, and Data Centers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:04:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A Practical Guide to the Early Days of Data Center Containers by A Standard for Data Center Containers? &#124; Nexus Technologies - IT Company providing Virtualisation Solutions, IT managed Services and IT Consultancy</title>
		<link>http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/a-practical-guide-to-the-early-days-of-data-center-containers/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>A Standard for Data Center Containers? &#124; Nexus Technologies - IT Company providing Virtualisation Solutions, IT managed Services and IT Consultancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/a-practical-guide-to-the-early-days-of-data-center-containers/#comment-556</guid>
		<description>[...] is no set industry standards when it comes to data center containers,” Manos wrote in a recent blog post. “This means that each vendor might have their own approach on what goes in, and what stays out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is no set industry standards when it comes to data center containers,” Manos wrote in a recent blog post. “This means that each vendor might have their own approach on what goes in, and what stays out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Support UnderArmour / Support our Veterans by Nigel</title>
		<link>http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/support-underarmour-support-our-veterans/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/support-underarmour-support-our-veterans/#comment-555</guid>
		<description>Michael,
I was quite surprised to see you wearing a poppy on stage for your talks in London.  I struck me interesting that here is an American wearing a Poppy on Rememberance Day. Especially in comparison to many of our own native speakers who went poppy-less.

Nigel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
I was quite surprised to see you wearing a poppy on stage for your talks in London.  I struck me interesting that here is an American wearing a Poppy on Rememberance Day. Especially in comparison to many of our own native speakers who went poppy-less.</p>
<p>Nigel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Data Center Junk Science: Thermal Shock \ Cooling Shock by Chris</title>
		<link>http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/data-center-junk-science-thermal-shock-cooling-shock/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/data-center-junk-science-thermal-shock-cooling-shock/#comment-554</guid>
		<description>&quot;Since the group that wrote this book included all of the major server vendors, it must have been created with some type of justifiable reason.&quot;

My guess is that it&#039;s the same reason that air temps must be at 17C. Consensus and covering ones own ass.

If you were being scientific about it you&#039;d strap a dozen thermocouples to say 10000-20000 servers and actually measure the temperature excursion vs failure rate in half a dozen facilities over the life of the servers. My guess is that unless Google or Mr Manos set this experiment up then it simply hasn&#039;t been done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Since the group that wrote this book included all of the major server vendors, it must have been created with some type of justifiable reason.&#8221;</p>
<p>My guess is that it&#8217;s the same reason that air temps must be at 17C. Consensus and covering ones own ass.</p>
<p>If you were being scientific about it you&#8217;d strap a dozen thermocouples to say 10000-20000 servers and actually measure the temperature excursion vs failure rate in half a dozen facilities over the life of the servers. My guess is that unless Google or Mr Manos set this experiment up then it simply hasn&#8217;t been done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Data Center Junk Science: Thermal Shock \ Cooling Shock by Chris</title>
		<link>http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/data-center-junk-science-thermal-shock-cooling-shock/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/data-center-junk-science-thermal-shock-cooling-shock/#comment-553</guid>
		<description>&quot;In data centres it is the temperature – where is it measured?&quot;

This might be a little cynical, but I&#039;d guess it&#039;s at the instrument which shows the lowest excursion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In data centres it is the temperature – where is it measured?&#8221;</p>
<p>This might be a little cynical, but I&#8217;d guess it&#8217;s at the instrument which shows the lowest excursion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Data Center Junk Science: Thermal Shock \ Cooling Shock by NEBSman</title>
		<link>http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/data-center-junk-science-thermal-shock-cooling-shock/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>NEBSman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/data-center-junk-science-thermal-shock-cooling-shock/#comment-551</guid>
		<description>Mike, as well as Dave are right. 3C/hr is not a shock, it is insignificant change on temperature at glacier pace. Mil-810 shock is a shock, and can have some real reliability issues, but how many such events you expect to see in the data center ?

NEBS specifications call for equipment to handle temperature rates of change of 30C/hr. As far as I know (and been on designing NEBS compliant equipment, including bu t not limited to servers for quite some time), we have newer had any real issues meeting this requirement on tests, or any failures on field attributed to same.

Now, recall that the ASHRAE stands for &quot;American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers&quot;. Sure, there are server vendors in the bunch, and all are happy to overspecify the environmentals -- server vendors &quot;just in case&quot;, and to maybe save a few $$s on cooling solution cost (applies to max temp&#039;s not changes). &quot;R&quot; people want to keep the box servers live within as small as possible -- bigger the box, less revenue and profit there is to be had. Do not expect objective environmental specifications come out of TC9.9. 

The green movement is good here -- it calls for change, or at least forces people to defend the state of affair by data, which &quot;keep the box small&quot; folks will not have to offer. 

EU CoC for data centers refers to yet to be published revision ETSI environmental spec for the IT equipment. This calls for Environmental category 3.1 (tops at 40C), which includes 3.1E (excursion to 45C) for limited time periods. Btw, the only salient revision to present spec is addition of two words &quot;Data Centres&quot; and &quot;Computer Halls&quot; under list of where the class 3.1 applies, right after &quot;Telecommunications Centres&quot; and &quot;storage rooms for valuable and sensitive products&quot;. ETSI Spec is ETSI EN 300 019-1-3, and can be downloaded for free from ETSI web site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, as well as Dave are right. 3C/hr is not a shock, it is insignificant change on temperature at glacier pace. Mil-810 shock is a shock, and can have some real reliability issues, but how many such events you expect to see in the data center ?</p>
<p>NEBS specifications call for equipment to handle temperature rates of change of 30C/hr. As far as I know (and been on designing NEBS compliant equipment, including bu t not limited to servers for quite some time), we have newer had any real issues meeting this requirement on tests, or any failures on field attributed to same.</p>
<p>Now, recall that the ASHRAE stands for &#8220;American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers&#8221;. Sure, there are server vendors in the bunch, and all are happy to overspecify the environmentals &#8212; server vendors &#8220;just in case&#8221;, and to maybe save a few $$s on cooling solution cost (applies to max temp&#8217;s not changes). &#8220;R&#8221; people want to keep the box servers live within as small as possible &#8212; bigger the box, less revenue and profit there is to be had. Do not expect objective environmental specifications come out of TC9.9. </p>
<p>The green movement is good here &#8212; it calls for change, or at least forces people to defend the state of affair by data, which &#8220;keep the box small&#8221; folks will not have to offer. </p>
<p>EU CoC for data centers refers to yet to be published revision ETSI environmental spec for the IT equipment. This calls for Environmental category 3.1 (tops at 40C), which includes 3.1E (excursion to 45C) for limited time periods. Btw, the only salient revision to present spec is addition of two words &#8220;Data Centres&#8221; and &#8220;Computer Halls&#8221; under list of where the class 3.1 applies, right after &#8220;Telecommunications Centres&#8221; and &#8220;storage rooms for valuable and sensitive products&#8221;. ETSI Spec is ETSI EN 300 019-1-3, and can be downloaded for free from ETSI web site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Our Vision for Generation 4 Modular Data Centers &#8211; One way of Getting it just right . . . by dia a dia, bit a bit&#8230; por Silvio Meira &#187; informaticidade: brasil investe em data centers</title>
		<link>http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/our-vision-for-generation-4-modular-data-centers-one-way-of-getting-it-just-right/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>dia a dia, bit a bit&#8230; por Silvio Meira &#187; informaticidade: brasil investe em data centers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/our-vision-for-generation-4-modular-data-centers-one-way-of-getting-it-just-right/#comment-550</guid>
		<description>[...] projeto, constru&#231;&#227;o e opera&#231;&#227;o de um centro computacional deste porte, v&#225; ler este link, onde a microsoft explica a estrat&#233;gia de centros computacionais da empresa. e onde [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] projeto, constru&ccedil;&atilde;o e opera&ccedil;&atilde;o de um centro computacional deste porte, v&aacute; ler este link, onde a microsoft explica a estrat&eacute;gia de centros computacionais da empresa. e onde [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Our Vision for Generation 4 Modular Data Centers &#8211; One way of Getting it just right . . . by dia a dia, bit a bit&#8230; por Silvio Meira &#187; informaticidade: brasil investe em data centers</title>
		<link>http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/our-vision-for-generation-4-modular-data-centers-one-way-of-getting-it-just-right/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>dia a dia, bit a bit&#8230; por Silvio Meira &#187; informaticidade: brasil investe em data centers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/our-vision-for-generation-4-modular-data-centers-one-way-of-getting-it-just-right/#comment-549</guid>
		<description>[...] da complexidade do projeto, construção e operação de um centro computacional deste porte, vá ler este link, onde a microsoft explica a estratégia de centros computacionais da empresa. e onde há diagramas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] da complexidade do projeto, construção e operação de um centro computacional deste porte, vá ler este link, onde a microsoft explica a estratégia de centros computacionais da empresa. e onde há diagramas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Our Vision for Generation 4 Modular Data Centers &#8211; One way of Getting it just right . . . by dia a dia, bit a bit&#8230; por Silvio Meira &#187; Brasil investe em data centers</title>
		<link>http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/our-vision-for-generation-4-modular-data-centers-one-way-of-getting-it-just-right/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>dia a dia, bit a bit&#8230; por Silvio Meira &#187; Brasil investe em data centers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/our-vision-for-generation-4-modular-data-centers-one-way-of-getting-it-just-right/#comment-548</guid>
		<description>[...] projeto, constru&#231;&#227;o e opera&#231;&#227;o de um centro computacional deste porte, v&#225; ler este link, onde a microsoft explica a estrat&#233;gia de centros computacionais da empresa. e onde [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] projeto, constru&ccedil;&atilde;o e opera&ccedil;&atilde;o de um centro computacional deste porte, v&aacute; ler este link, onde a microsoft explica a estrat&eacute;gia de centros computacionais da empresa. e onde [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Cloud Politic &#8211; How Regulation, Taxes, and National Borders are shaping the infrastructure of the cloud by Your important business info going overseas? &#171; BeYourOwnIT&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2009/08/06/the-cloud-politic-how-regulation-taxes-and-national-borders-are-shaping-the-infrastructure-of-the-cloud/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Your important business info going overseas? &#171; BeYourOwnIT&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2009/08/06/the-cloud-politic-how-regulation-taxes-and-national-borders-are-shaping-the-infrastructure-of-the-cloud/#comment-546</guid>
		<description>[...] fact that, once you put your sensitive personal and business data into the cloud, you really have no control over the physical location where that data resides. It’s very easy for large technology companies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fact that, once you put your sensitive personal and business data into the cloud, you really have no control over the physical location where that data resides. It’s very easy for large technology companies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Practical Guide to the Early Days of Data Center Containers by mmanos</title>
		<link>http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/a-practical-guide-to-the-early-days-of-data-center-containers/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>mmanos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/a-practical-guide-to-the-early-days-of-data-center-containers/#comment-545</guid>
		<description>Greg,

You are exactly right as far as the metal enclosure component of a data center container.  The trick will be whether or not the change of use is significant enough for the IRS to either create a sub-class or another class entirely.   Another option could be to keep the Container at 5 years and then individually depreciate the components inside.   I guess my primary point here is that your Finance teams should definitely start looking at this as its bit trickier.  As the container industry matures this should eventually be solved.  Until then, make sure you have a bean-counter involved. (No offense of course :) )

\Mm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,</p>
<p>You are exactly right as far as the metal enclosure component of a data center container.  The trick will be whether or not the change of use is significant enough for the IRS to either create a sub-class or another class entirely.   Another option could be to keep the Container at 5 years and then individually depreciate the components inside.   I guess my primary point here is that your Finance teams should definitely start looking at this as its bit trickier.  As the container industry matures this should eventually be solved.  Until then, make sure you have a bean-counter involved. (No offense of course <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
<p>\Mm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
