<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Struggling with CADE, McKinsey / Uptime Metric (RE-POST)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/struggling-with-cade-mckinsey-uptime-metric-re-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/struggling-with-cade-mckinsey-uptime-metric-re-post/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Cloud Computing, Infrastructure at Scale, and Data Centers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:20:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Aldrich</title>
		<link>http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/struggling-with-cade-mckinsey-uptime-metric-re-post/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Aldrich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/struggling-with-cade-mckinsey-uptime-metric-re-post/#comment-515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with many of the points you make here.  First and foremost that very few operators are measuring even the basics.  I see the same typical response when I pose the question to audiences I speak to.

What I see as the biggest gap that will be filled in the next 1-2 years in this space is the ability to commonly and cost effectively monitor the load directly.  When I say the load I mean both facilities and IT.  

I am of course biased being a Cisco guy but we are laser focused on developing our networks as an open platform that can monitor and control IT loads through the OS and extend this schema through building mediation to the facilities infrastructure (monitoring in the near term, control in the mid).

If not the network then what?  Isn&#039;t in the logical choice if it can be open, common and run on existing infra?

My 2 cents.

Thanks for the follow up post, nice one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with many of the points you make here.  First and foremost that very few operators are measuring even the basics.  I see the same typical response when I pose the question to audiences I speak to.</p>
<p>What I see as the biggest gap that will be filled in the next 1-2 years in this space is the ability to commonly and cost effectively monitor the load directly.  When I say the load I mean both facilities and IT.  </p>
<p>I am of course biased being a Cisco guy but we are laser focused on developing our networks as an open platform that can monitor and control IT loads through the OS and extend this schema through building mediation to the facilities infrastructure (monitoring in the near term, control in the mid).</p>
<p>If not the network then what?  Isn&#8217;t in the logical choice if it can be open, common and run on existing infra?</p>
<p>My 2 cents.</p>
<p>Thanks for the follow up post, nice one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
